> Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5.1: index scores 200 and 192 (GPT-4 = 100), API prices, context windows and results on the same independent tests, side by side.

Up to four models

# Compare

Side by side on the same independent tests, with price and context. The link in your address bar shares this exact comparison.

[Claude Opus 5.5](https://themodelindex.org/models/claude-opus-5-5/)

[Claude Fable 5.1](https://themodelindex.org/models/claude-fable-5-1/)

Add model

Next to Claude Opus 5.5

Best open model, measured

Kimi K3

Closest rival, another lab

GPT-6 Astra

The version it replaced

Claude Opus 5

Where it started

GPT-4

Presets

Best open vs best closed (measured)

Today vs GPT-4 (2023)

Top three labs

US vs China, best of each

[Claude Opus 5.5](https://themodelindex.org/models/claude-opus-5-5/)

200

188–211

Weights

Closed

Released

Sep 2026

Price in / out

$4.0 / $20

Context

1M

Core tests taken

4 of 8

[Claude Fable 5.1](https://themodelindex.org/models/claude-fable-5-1/)

192

181–203

Weights

Closed

Released

Sep 2026

Price in / out

$10 / $50

Context

1M

Core tests taken

4 of 8

Claude Opus 5.5 leads Claude Fable 5.1 by 8 points, ahead on 3 of 3 shared core tests, and costs 2.5× less.

## Test by test · independent results · Epoch AI

Claude Opus 5.5

Claude Fable 5.1

_Chart: Test results for the selected models_

Only tests that at least two of these models have taken. Bold rows are the core tests shown on every profile; all of these results inform the index score. Task length (METR) is listed below the chart because it is a duration, not a percentage.

---
Source: https://themodelindex.org/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-claude-fable-5-1/ · The Model Index · data as of 2026-10-01